On September 13, 1994, then-President Bill Clinton signed
into law the Violence Against Women Act (Title IV, §§40001-40703 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994; Public Law
103-322). The aim of the Act was to fund investigations and prosecutions of
violent crimes against women, to impose automatic and mandatory restitution on
those convicted, and allow civil redress in cases prosecutors chose to leave
unprosecuted. The Act also provided “anonymity
to victims of domestic abuse who are applying for residency visas so that their
applications cannot be sabotaged by their alleged abusers.” Also, to encourage
cooperation with law enforcement officials, witnesses are provided with an
opportunity to apply for special residency, and eventually permanent
residence. The Act has already been
renewed twice, with bipartisan support.
However, the last Bill authorizing the continuation of the Act
expired in 2011. The Senate has approved a Bill expanded protections for lesbians,
immigrants and Native Americans and passed with bipartisan support with a vote
of 68-31. However, on Wednesday the House
of Representatives passed their version of the Bill, stripping away the
protections for immigrants who are subjected to such violence or who witness
such acts of violence. Some feel the
House Bill will discourage immigrant women from reporting abuse for fear of
being deported. At the same time, the
House Bill also makes it more difficult for Native American women to seek
justice against their abusers; the House version also provides no protection
for the LGBT community.
As for the elimination of protections for immigrant women, it
is argued that this may be the only way to prevent fraud and abuse of the
system by women seeking citizenship in the United States. However, it is countered that all visa
applications from immigrant victims already go through extensive review and
require extensive documentation.
With such limitations put in place by the House of
Representatives, the Violence Against Women Act will cease to protect women
from abuse as the original Act intended.
The House ignores the needs of immigrant women, Native Americans and the
LGBT community, classes of women that need at least the same protection as all
other female citizens. And the
justification of preventing fraud by immigrant women seems unfounded; this Act
has already been renewed twice without previous Congresses feeling the need to
add such limitations, and safeguards are already in place in the visa process
to reduce the risk of fraud. It is
believed that the House version of this Bill will be vetoed without removing
the restrictions, restoring the Act to its original intentions. Whether through veto or other manner,
hopefully the House and Senate can reach agreement on renewing the Act in a way
that will ensure protection for all.
Further information can be found at these articles from the Huffington Post and Los Angeles Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment